TL;DR
Get smart everyday buys delivered free — and shop member deals
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Access to Prime Big Deal Days deals on October 6–7
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
Personal Assets Trust’s net asset value rose 20.8% over the five years to the end of August, while UK CPI inflation averaged 5% a year and increased 27.5% over the period, according to MoneyWeek. The figures show the trust fell behind inflation over that span; they do not establish whether it can recover or how it will perform in future.
Personal Assets Trust’s net asset value rose 20.8% over the five years to the end of August, below the 27.5% increase in UK CPI reported for the same period, according to MoneyWeek. The comparison shows the preservation-focused investment trust did not keep pace with consumer prices over that period, raising questions for investors who bought it to protect purchasing power.
MoneyWeek says UK consumer price inflation averaged 5% a year over the five-year period, amounting to a reported 27.5% cumulative rise. Personal Assets’ stated return was measured by its net asset value, or NAV, rather than its share price. The report gives an annualised NAV return of 3.85% a year through the end of August.
The same comparison includes two other wealth-preservation trusts. Ruffer returned 20% in NAV terms, or 3.7% a year, while Capital Gearing returned 11.5%, or 2.2% a year, according to the report. MoneyWeek says all three lost value after inflation over the five years. These are historical figures, not a forecast of future results.
The source frames the figures as a disappointment for investors who turned to wealth-preservation trusts over the past five years. It does not provide details in the supplied material about Personal Assets’ portfolio changes, individual holdings, share-price performance or the reasons behind its return. Nor does the comparison alone show whether the trust can recover the gap.
A five-year gap against inflation
The comparison matters because nominal growth is not the same as preserving purchasing power. If a portfolio rises less than consumer prices over a given period, the return has not matched the increase in the cost of the CPI basket, before accounting for any relevant investor-specific costs or taxes. That is the central concern raised by MoneyWeek’s figures for Personal Assets.
For readers considering a wealth-preservation trust, the result is a reminder that a stated aim or reputation does not guarantee protection from inflation over every period. The numbers also need careful interpretation: they compare the trust’s NAV return with inflation, not an individual investor’s total outcome. Share prices can differ from NAV, and the supplied report excerpt does not give information about charges, distributions, tax or investors’ purchase dates.
The figures cover a particular five-year window in which the report says inflation averaged 5% annually. They do not establish that Personal Assets has failed over all periods, or that another trust would necessarily have delivered a better inflation-adjusted result in the future. They show that the reported NAV gain did not match CPI over the stated period.
wealth preservation investment trusts
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
How the trust comparison was measured
Personal Assets Trust, Capital Gearing and Ruffer are presented in the source as wealth-preservation trusts that investors have used in seeking to protect assets. MoneyWeek compares their NAV performance over five years with UK inflation measured by the consumer price index. NAV represents the value of a trust’s underlying assets less its liabilities, expressed per share; it is distinct from the price at which the trust’s shares trade on the stock market.
The source gives returns to the end of August but does not specify the calendar year in the material supplied here. Its reported figures are 20.8% for Personal Assets, 20% for Ruffer and 11.5% for Capital Gearing, with annualised figures of 3.85%, 3.7% and 2.2%, respectively. It reports CPI inflation of 27.5% cumulatively, averaging 5% a year. Those figures provide a backward-looking comparison; they are not a complete assessment of each trust’s strategy, risk or future prospects.
““With Personal Assets Trust (LSE: PNL), Capital Gearing (LSE: CGT) and Ruffer (LSE: RICA) all losing value after inflation, many investors who turned to wealth preservation trusts over the past five years will have been disappointed.””
— MoneyWeek
inflation-protected investment funds
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
What the figures cannot tell investors
The supplied report material does not state the calendar year for the end-of-August measurement, detail the trust’s latest portfolio or explain which holdings and market conditions drove its performance. It also does not provide the trust’s outlook or a specific recovery plan. As a result, the causes of the inflation-adjusted shortfall and the prospects for a rebound cannot be established from these figures alone.
The comparison is based on NAV returns, while an investor’s result can also depend on the share price paid, any distributions, fees and personal circumstances. The source excerpt does not specify how those factors were treated. It also gives no newer performance data, so the figures should not be read as a statement of the trust’s current return or current valuation.
Whether Personal Assets can catch up with inflation in the future remains uncertain. Historical returns do not guarantee later performance, and a five-year comparison cannot by itself show whether the trust’s approach will work over a different market cycle.
best NAV tracking investment trusts
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
The next test is future performance
The supplied material does not identify a forthcoming decision, management change or scheduled event for Personal Assets Trust. The next useful evidence for investors would be updated performance figures and reporting from the trust, including information on its portfolio, investment approach and any changes to its outlook. Those details would help explain whether recent results reflect a particular period or a continuing pattern.
Any assessment of recovery will also depend on the time period and measure used. Readers can compare subsequent NAV returns with inflation over matching dates, while keeping share-price performance and any distributions separate. Until newer information is available, the reported five-year figures are best treated as a historical record of an inflation shortfall, not evidence that a recovery is either assured or impossible.
inflation hedge investment products
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Key Questions
How much did Personal Assets Trust gain over the reported five years?
MoneyWeek reports a 20.8% rise in NAV to the end of August, equivalent to an annualised return of 3.85% a year. The source material does not specify the calendar year for that end date.
How did that compare with inflation?
The report says UK CPI averaged 5% a year and rose 27.5% over the five-year period. On those reported figures, Personal Assets’ NAV gain fell short of the cumulative CPI increase.
Did the other trusts in the comparison also trail inflation?
Yes. MoneyWeek reports five-year NAV gains of 20% for Ruffer and 11.5% for Capital Gearing, and says all three trusts lost value after inflation over the period.
Does the comparison prove Personal Assets Trust can recover?
No. The figures describe past performance and do not establish what will happen next. The supplied material does not include a forecast or enough information about the trust’s portfolio and strategy to determine its recovery prospects.
Source: rss
Fall Picks
fall essentials
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
